Rajeev Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51735 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2019 Thana- DESARI District- Vaishali ====================================================== RAJEEV KUMAR SINGH Son of Lalan Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Phatehpur Bujurg, P.O. - Sahdei Bujurg, P.S.- Desri (Sahdei O.P.), District - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ansul, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bindhyachal Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 20-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner in the present case is seeking regular bail in connection with Desari (Sahdei O.P.) P.S. Case No. 11 of 2019 registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned A.C.J.M. - 11th , Vaishali at Hajipur.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case with ulterior motive. Petitioner is husband of the deceased and were spending their life peacefully but unfortunately she died by burnt while she was cooking.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail, however submits that in this case out of six charge-sheet

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51735 of 2019(3) dt.20-11-2019 2/2 witnesses only two witnesses have already been examined and four witnesses are to be examined on behalf of the prosecution. Considering the facts that out of six charge-sheet witnesses two witnesses have already been examined as have been stated by learned counsel for the informant and now only four more witnesses are to be examined on behalf of the prosecution, this court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner at this stage.

The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The application is dismissed accordingly.

No unnecessary adjournment shall be granted by the trial court.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U T