← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39245/2018bail granted

Pankaj Kumar Singh @ Pankaj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-07-11Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39245 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-642 Year-2018 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Pankaj Kumar Singh @ Pankaj Kumar S/o Mahendra Singh, R/o Vill.- Naykagaon Kota , P.S.- Darigam, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kamla Kant Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ahtash Ali Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 379, 411, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 153 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of disclosure made by the co-accused namely Jitendra Singh. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39245 of 2018(2) dt.11-07-2018 2/2 the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 153 liters wine is recovered from the car in question. The car in question does not belong to the petitioner. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional District & Sessions Judge -cum- Special Judge, Excise, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (Darigaon) P.S. Case No. 642 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.