← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/20791/2011disposed

Chandra Deo Sharma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-12-04Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20791 of 2011 =========================================================== Chandra Deo Sharma, son of Late Jhalku Sharma, resident of Village and P.O.- Sonebhadra, P.S.-Karpi, District-Arwal.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Primary Education Department, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3. The Director-cum-Joint Commissioner, Directorate Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

4. The Collector, Jehanabad, Distt.-Jehanabad.

5. The District Provident Fund Officer, Jehanabad, Dist.-Jehanabad.

6. The District Programme Officer, Establishment (Jehanabad), Distt.-Jehanabad.

7. The District Programme Officer Establishment (Arwal), Distt.-Arwal.

8. The Treasury Officer (Arwal), Distt.-Arwal.

9. The Block Education Extension Officer (Karpi), Distt.-Arwal.

10. The Area Officer, Arwal, Distt.-Arwal.

11. The Drawing & Disbursing Officer, Middle School, Sonebhadra (Karpi), Distt.- Arwal.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Respondent/s : Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 04-12-2015 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the State is present.

By order dated 25.11.2011, two weeks time was granted to learned counsel for the petitioner for filing supplementary affidavit and make specific statement regarding the date on which last payment of G.P.F. amount was made to the petitioner. The same has not been done.

Patna High Court CWJC No.20791 of 2011 dt.04-12-2015 2/2 In view of the aforesaid and also taking into account the fact that nobody appears to press the writ petition, the Court can only presume that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar/- U T