Prabhunath Prasad v. The State Of Bihar Through D. G. P. Bihar, Patna And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 1645 of 2017 Arising out of Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 294 of 2016 ====================================================== Prabhunath Prasad, son of Mohan Sah, resident of Village- Sujai Ward No. 5, P.S.- Barauli, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through D. G. P. Bihar, Patna. 2.

Praveen Kumar, The Officer-in-Charge of Baikunthpur Police Station, Gopalganj.

3.

Ravi Ranjan Kumar, The Superintendent of Police, Gopalganj. 4.

Arbind Kumar, Son of Chhote Lal Sah, 5.

Ajay Kumar @ Abhay Kumar, Son of Chhote Lal Sah, 6.

Arun Kumar, Son of Chhote Lal Sah, 7.

Akhilesh Kumar, Son of Chhote Lal Sah, 8.

Ajit Kumar, Son of Chhote Lal Sah, 9.

Rajan Kumar, Son of Chhote Lal Sah, 10.

Chhote Lal Sah, Son of Late Debi Sah, All residents of Village- Basahan, P.O.- Rajapatti, P.S.- Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sudhir Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ghosarvey, AC to AAG 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 08-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC to AAG 3 for the State.

2. Pursuant to the previous orders, the Superintendent of Police, Gopalganj has submitted a report in terms of the direction of the Court in a sealed cover. At the request of the Court, learned counsel for the State has opened the seal and has assisted the

Patna High Court MJC No.1645 of 2017 dt.08-11-2019 2/2 Court on the basis of such report. In nutshell, the report states that against Shatrudhan Sah and Nagendra Prasad Gupta, there is circumstantial evidence implicating them in connection with Baikunthpur PS Case No. 58 of 2014.

3. Let the report be retained on the records of the case.

4. At this stage, learned counsel for the State submitted that in view of the finding of the Superintendent of Police, Gopalganj, further action, in accordance with law, shall be taken.

5. Having regard to the aforesaid, the Court finds that the order dated 21.07.2016 passed in Cr. WJC No. 294 of 2016, has been complied with.

6. Accordingly, the application stands disposed off with the observation that the district police, Gopalganj shall take appropriate necessary action in light of the report submitted to the Court in the present case by the Superintendent of Police, Gopalganj and take matters to their logical conclusion, without any undue delay.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U T