Ranjeet Ram @ Guddu Ram @ Ranjit Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50972 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2019 Thana- JANDAHA District- Vaishali ====================================================== RANJEET RAM @ GUDDU RAM @ RANJIT RAM SON OF SANTLAL RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SHUBHAI (LANGA SHUBHAI), P.S.- HAJIPUR SADAR, DISTRICT- VAISHALI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mrityunjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan : Mrs. Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-12-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. As per the prosecution case, the police arrested coaccused persons discolsed that Vijay Rai, Ranjit Ram @ Guddu, Guddu Yadav, Chandan fled away. It is further alleged that a country-made loaded pistol was recovered from the possession of the Sumit Kumar. The apprehended persons also disclosed

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50972 of 2022(2) dt.14-12-2022 2/2 that they were making plan to commit loot and dacoity. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 27.05.2019 and 22.07.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 34352 and 45093 respectively. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is accused in three other criminal cases as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 14.06.2022.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Vaishali in connection with Jandaha P.S. Case No. 03 of 2019 The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Ayush/niku/- U T