Md. Imdad Hussain v. The Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10881 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.

Md. Imdad Hussain Son of Late Abdul Tauwab @ Abdul Taiyab @ Taiyab Resident of Village-Gogri, P.S. Gogri, Distirct-Khagaria. 2.

Ahmad Hussain Son of Late Abdul Tauwab @ Abdul Taiyab @ Taiyab Resident of Village-Gogri, P.S. Gogri, Distirct-Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through its Secretary, Road Transport and Highways, Department, Govt. of India 2.

The Chairman, National Hgihway Authority of India, New Delhi. 3.

The Project Director, National Highway Authority of India, New Delhi. 4.

The State of Bihar through Chief Secreary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

6.

The District Magistrate, Munger.

7.

The Competent Authority Cum District Land Acquisition Officer, Munger. 8.

The Circle Officer, Sadar Anchal, Munger District-Munger. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Additional Solicitor General For NHAI :

Mr. Rajesh Shandilya, Advocate Mr. Vinayak Harshvardhan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file a detailed representation before respondent no. 6 i.e. District Magistrate, Munger annexing all the relevant documents in support of their claim within a period of six weeks.

Patna High Court CWJC No.10881 of 2023(2) dt.02-07-2024 2/2

3. In view of the aforesaid, the respondent no. 6 is directed to consider the representation of the petitioners on its own merit and decide the same within a period of three months. If the decision of the respondent no. 6 is found to be in favour of the petitioner then the same shall be communicated to the petitioners and all the consequential benefits shall also be given to the petitioners within a period of two months, thereafter.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U