Ram Lochan Ram v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10016 of 2011 ====================================================== Ram Lochan Ram S/O Late Domo Lal Ram Resident of Village-Jitwarpur, Nijayat, P.S.-Samastipur, District-Samastipur, At Present Posted As Junior Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Department, Gulzarbagh P.S-Gulzarbagh District-Patna.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar Through Engineer-In-Chief-Cum-Additional Commissioner Cum Special Secretary Road Construction Department, Bihar , Patna.

2. The Under Secretary, Government of Bihar Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Chief Engineer (Traffic) North Bihar Sub Section, Road Construction Department Darbhanga.

4. The Executive Engineer Road Construction Department Road Division Samastipur.

5. The Executive Engineer Road Construction Department Road Division Madhepura.

6. The Executive Engineer Road Construction Department Road Division Darbhanga.

7. The Executive Engineer Road Construction Department Road Division Patna City, Road Division Gulzarbagh,Patna.

8. The Sub Divisional Officer Road Construction Department Murliganj, Madhepura.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rana Sanjay Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : AC to SC 30 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3.

07-01-2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of learned A.C. to Standing Counsel - 30, submits that it appears from the facts disclosed in the counter affidavit that most of the grievances have already been redressed and in respect of some of claims, same are under-process. He makes a prayer for disposal of the writ petition, in terms of the facts disclosed in the counter

Patna High Court CWJC No.10016 of 2011 (3) dt.07-01-2016 2/2 affidavit.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. The Court expects that in terms of statement made in the counter affidavit, the respondents may take appropriate step for redressing remaining grievance of the petitioner. (Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U