Karan Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51715 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-260 Year-2018 Thana- BARHIYA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.
Karan Singh S/o Bachchu Singh R/o - Ward No. 12, Gram Dhiradhar Jwas Juas, P.S - Barahiya, District - Lakhisarai, Bihar - 811311 2.
Gautam Kumar S/o Karan Singh R/o - Ward No. 12, Gram Dhiradhar Jwas Juas, P.S - Barahiya, District - Lakhisarai, Bihar - 811311 3.
Uttam Kumar S/o Karan Singh R/o - Ward No. 12, Gram Dhiradhar Jwas Juas, P.S - Barahiya, District - Lakhisarai, Bihar - 811311 ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shailesh Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Barahiya P.S. Case No. 260 of 2018 dated 26.11.2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 308/34 of the I.P.C.
3. As per prosecution case, the accusation against the petitioners is of assaulting the Informant due to which he sustained injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51715 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026 2/3 present case. It is next submitted that the petitioners were extended the benefits under Section 41-A of the Cr.P.C. and there is no allegation of having misused such privilege and upon investigation, the charge-sheet has been filed, which has given reason for apprehension of arrest to the petitioners, while the injuries have been found to be simple in nature. It is further submitted that nothing specific has been alleged against the petitioners rather the same is general and omnibus in nature.
5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering that noting specific has been alleged against the petitioners while the injuries caused upon the Informant is said to have been simple in nature and, as also, the petitioners having no criminal antecedent and no allegation of misuse of privilege extended under Section 41-A of the Cr.P.C., let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Barahiya P.S.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51715 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026 3/3 Case No. 260 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. as well as the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors should be the family member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document / personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of their bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. (Ajit Kumar, J) rishi/- U T