Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48861/2025bail rejected

Arun Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-19Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48861 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2021 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Arun Kumar Yadav Son of Deonath Rai @ Dev Nath Ray RO Village -Akouna PS -Chiraiya District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-08-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 332, 333, 337, 338, 307, 353, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that this petitioner, along with other F.I.R. named accused persons, assaulted police personnel with bricks, stones, lathi and danda as a result of which, some police personnel sustained injuries.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48861 of 2025(2) dt.19-08-2025 2/2 against this petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that he, along with other accused persons, assaulted police party as a result of which several police personnel sustained injuries and created hindrance in discharge of their official duties.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of accusation, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T