Jagdish Mani Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9204 of 2011 ====================================================== Jagdish Mani Tiwari S/O Late Maheshwari Tiwari R/O Vill.- Chandaur, P.O. Tarwa Parasia, Police Station- Darauli, Distt.- Siwan, at present posted & Working as an Assistant Teacher in govt. Basic School-Mahuja, AnchalDarauli, dist.- Siwan .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
2. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna
3. The Divisional Education Establishment Committee through its Chairman, the Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saran Division at Chapra
4. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saran Division at Chapra
5. The District Education Officer, Siwan
6. The District Education Officer, Chapra Distt.- Saran
7. The District Education Officer, Gopalganj
8. The District Superintendent of Education, Siwan
9. The District Superintendent of Education, Chapra Distt.- Saran
10. The District Superintendent of Education, Gopalganj
11. The District Magistrate, Siwan
12. The Deputy Development Commissioner cum Chairman District Education Establishment Committee, Siwan
13. The District Treasury Officer, Siwan
14. The Headmaster-cum-Drawing and Disbursing Officer, Govt. Basic School Mahuja, Anchal- Darauli, Distt.- Siwan .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. AC to PAAG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-02-2016 Sri Shyama Kant Singh, learned counsel, on instruction of Sri Umesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of learned AC to Principal Addl. Advocate General, submits that by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.
Patna High Court CWJC No.9204 of 2011 (5) dt.08-02-2016 2/2 Accordingly, there is no need to keep the matter pending. The writ petition stands disposed of. (Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U