← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/12475/2011dismissed

Anni Verma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-02-10Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12475 of 2011 ====================================================== Anni Verma W/O Ajay Kumar Das resident of Professor Colony, Ward No. 25 (Old 18), P.S.- Forbesganj, District - Araria .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Director I.C.D.S., Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

3. The District Magistrate Araria, Distt.- Araria

4. The District Superintendent Of Education-Cum-District Programme Coordinator Araria, Distt.- Araria

5. The District Welfare Officer Araria District Araria

6. The Block Education Extension Officer Forbesganj, Distt.- Araria

7. The C.D.P.O Forbesganj, Block-Forbesganj, Distt.- Araria

8. The Ward Commissioner Ward No. 25 (Old 18), Forbesganj, Distt.- Araria

9. The Division In-Charge-Cum- District Gender Co-Ordinator (NPEGEL) Office Of District Superintendent Of Education-Cum-District Programme Co-Ordinator, Araria

10. The District Resources Group Office Of DSE-Cum-District Programme, Co-Ordinator (DRG), Araria District Araria

11. The Controller-Cum-Principal Sankul Kanya Middle School, Forbesganj, Distt.- Araria

12. The Co-Ordinator Sankul Kanya Middle School, Forbesganj, Distt.- Araria

13. Babita Kumari "Baby" W/O Sri Ranjeet Kumar Singh resident of Prof. Colony, Ward No. 25 (Old 18), P.S.- Forbesganj, Distt.- Araira .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar Verma For the Respondent/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-02-2016 Sri Santosh Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of learned AC to SC No. 26 and Sri Diwakar Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 13

Patna High Court CWJC No.12475 of 2011 (3) dt.10-02-2016 2/2 submits that he has been instructed by his client not to press the petition.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U