Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8915/2015disposed

Arun Kumar Sharma v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2015-03-04Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8915 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -663 Year- 2014 Thana -SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSAMASTIPUR ====================================================== Arun Kumar Sharma Son of Sri Kameshwar Mistri resident of village Kop Balia, P.S. Rupauli, District - Purnia ( Bihar ) Presently residing at Furkating Loco Colony, P.O. Furkating, P.S. Gola Ghat, Distt. - Gola Ghat Assam .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Ritu Sharma D/o Mohan Lal Sharma resident of village - Sobhaipura, P.S. Hasanpur, District - Samastipur .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jagdish Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 04-03-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case under Section 498(A) and other sections of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

The petitioner is the husband and he is ready to keep his wife. The petitioner also filed a petition for restitution of conjugal rights.

Considering the submissions of the petitioner, the above named petitioner is directed to surrender in the court below within four weeks from today and the court below shall, after issuing notice to the complainant, enlarge the petitioner on provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8915 of 2015 (2) dt.04-03-2015 2/2 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri K. Kumar, J.M. 1st Class, Rosera, Distt. Samastipur in C.R. No. 663/14, corresponding to TR No. 4393/14. The court below shall make all efforts for resolving of the dispute between the husband and the wife. If the dispute is resolved between the parties, the provisional bail so granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed. In case the dispute is not resolved, the court below shall pass orders on the prayer for provisional bail of the petitioner on its own merit in accordance with law. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Dilip/- U T