Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16269/2016bail granted

Ranjeet Kumar And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar

2016-07-01Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16269 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -148 Year- 2015 Thana -PHULWARIA District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Ranjeet Kumar, Son of Birendra Pandey,

2. Udai Pal Son of Jitendra Pal,

3. Aman Kumar, Son of Suresh Singh, 1 to 3 resident of village - Ladhpur, P.S. - Fulwaria, District - Gopalganj.

4. Kanhaiya Prasad, Son of Late Kishore Prasad

5. Ram Pravesh Ram, Son of Satya Narayan Ram,

6. Manoj Kumar, Son of Vijay Prasad, 4 to 6 resident of village - Bathua Bazar, P.S. - Fulwaria, District - Gopalganj.

7. Ram Nath Sah @ Guchkan Sah, Son of Jaishankar Sah,

8. Raju Sah, Son of Hoshila Sah,

9. Manoj Sah Son of Mishiri Sah,

10. Chhathu Sah, Son of Rajvanshi Sah,

11. Shailesh Sah, Son of Harischandra Sah,

12. Sugun Singh, Son of Late Sukhal Singh,

13. Mukesh Sah, Son of Sri Kishun Sah,

14. Gamha Singh, Son of Dinanath Singh,

15. Vijay Pandey, Son of Late Singhasan Pandey,

16. Tarkeshwar Pandey, Son of Srikant Pandey, 7 to 16 resident of village - Ladhpur, P.S. - Fulwaria, District - Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party : Mr. L.K.Sharma(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 15-07-2016 It has been submitted that petitioner no. 7 Ram Nath Sah @ Guchkan Sah and petitioner no. 10 Chhathu Sah have already been arrested, but due to typographical mistake in para-1 of the order dated 01.07.2016 in place of petitioner no. 10 Chhathu Sah, petitioner no. 8 Raju Sah has been typed. Accordingly, the order dated 01.07.2016 is modified to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16269 of 2016 (5) dt.15-07-2016 2/2 the extent that the anticipatory bail petition on behalf of petitioner no. 7 Ram Nath Sah @ Guchkan Sah and petitioner no. 10 Chhathu Sah is dismissed as having become infructuous. It appears that anticipatory bail petition on behalf of petitioner no. 4 has already been withdrawn vide order dated 24.05.2016.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.) KKSINHA/- U T