Deepak Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 1740 of 2017 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1430 of 2017 ====================================================== Deepak Kumar, Son of Late Jagdish Prasad, Resident of Mohalla- Gopal Nagar Nawada, P.S.- Nawada, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Bihar, Patna. (Anjani Kumar) 3.

The Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Department, Bihar, Patna. (Amir Shubhani) 4.

The Secretary, General Administration, Bihar, Patna. (Rakesh Ranjan) 5.

The Divisional Commissioner, Gaya. (Dr. K. P. Ramaih) 6.

The District Magistrate, Nawada. (Manoj Kumar) 7.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Nawada. (Ramjee Singh) 8.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Nawada, District- Nawada. (Himanshu Sharma) ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the State :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ghosarvey, AC to AAG 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 21-08-2019 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned AC to AAG 3 has assisted the Court.

2. The petitioner has moved the Court alleging non compliance of the order dated 14.02.2017 passed in CWJC No. 1430 of 2017. The same required the District Magistrate, Nawada to consider and take a final decision upon the representation filed by the petitioner.

Patna High Court MJC No.1740 of 2017 dt.21-08-2019 2/2

3. In the show cause filed on behalf of the opposite parties no. 6 to 8, copy of which was served on learned counsel for the petitioner on 20.11.2018, it has been stated that the District Magistrate, Nawada has passed order in terms of the writ Court order on 25.09.2017, copy of which has also been brought on record in the aforesaid show cause.

4. There being no rejoinder to the same, coupled with the fact that nobody has appeared on behalf of the petitioner and also the fact that the order dated 14.02.2017, stands complied with, nothing further remains in the present application.

5. Accordingly, the application stands disposed off. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U T