Manoj Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.34016 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2018 Thana- ANDHRAMATH District- Madhubani ====================================================== Manoj Paswan, s/o late Hari Prasad Paswan, resident of Village-Bhawtiyahi, P.S. -Bhawtiyahi, District - Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mrs. Anju Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-06-2018 Heard Mrs. Anju Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. None appeared on behalf of the State. The sole petitioner, who is in custody in connection with Andharamath P.S. Case No. 8 of 2018 corresponding to G.R. No. 65 of 2018 , registered for the offence under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 , has prayed for grant of bail.
It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that only since petitioner failed to produce owner book of the motorcycle which was being driven by him, he along with other two persons were apprehended by Police. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that one of the coaccused who was rider of the motorcycle namely, Brahamdeo Paswan @ Brahamdev Paswan had earlier approached this
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34016 of 2018(2) dt.25-06-2018 2/2 court vide Cr. Misc. No. 19575 of 2018 for grant of bail and his bail petition was disposed of on 11.04.2018 observing therein to release him after completion of six months of custody. On instruction , it has also been argued that one another accused also had approached this court for grant of bail and his prayer for bail was rejected with observation to renew the prayer after six months.
Fact remains that in this case petitioner himself was driving motorcycle which was said to be stolen and in paragraph no. 3 of the petition it has been indicated that he is accused in at least four other cases.
Accordingly, considering the nature of accusation his prayer for bail is rejected with observation that he may renew prayer for bail again after six months.
With above observation it stands dismissed.
(Rakesh Kumar, J) praful/- U T