Birendra Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38351 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2018 Thana- GANGABRIDGE District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.Birendra Kumar son of Mahendra Mahto

2. Mukesh Kumar, son of Ganesh Mahto, both residents of village- Chak Mahammad Chisti, P.S.- Gangabridge, District- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mahendra Thakur For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Satyadev Prasad Singh Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-06-2018 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners, already in custody, seek bail in connection with Ganga Bridge P.S.Case No. 72 of 2018 registered under Sections 379 and 411/34 of the Indian penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that allegation is that petitioners snatched mobile of a person, but that person has not lodged any complaint and it was not established that alleged mobile was recovered from the possession of the accused persons or stolen one and petitioners have clean antecedent.

Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioners, namely , Birendra Kumar and Mukesh Kumar are directed to be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38351 of 2018(2) dt.29-06-2018 2/2 Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Gangabridge P.S. Case No. 72 of 2018. (Arun Kumar, J) sujit/- U T