← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/52/2015disposed

Bechan Sharma @ Bechan Khatway And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-01-27Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.52 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Bechan Sharma @ Bechan Khatway

2. Mahendra Sharma @ Mahendra Khatway Both sons of Late Agam Khatway, resident of village- Nandana, P.S.- Jadia, District- Supaul.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Collector of the District, Supaul

3. Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Supaul

4. Anchal Adhikari, Triveniganj, Supaul

5. Madan Choudhary, wife of Late Banarasi Choudhary

6. Malti Choudhary, son of Madan Mohan Choudhary All residents of village- Chainpur, P.S. Kumar Khand, District- Saharsa .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Kumar Malendu, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manis Kumar Sinha, A.C. to S.C.30 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 27-01-2015 I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The grievance of the petitioners is that though upon his application filed under Section 48D of the Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885, the Case No.1 of 2014 was registered in which notice was issued upon the landlords directing them to appear on 7.3.2014, there is no progress at all in the case. The petitioners only want expeditious disposal of the case in accordance with law. In above view of the matter, this writ application is being disposed of, without going into the merit of the case, directing the respondent no.4, i.e., Anchal Adhikari, Triveniganj,

Patna High Court CWJC No.52 of 2015 (2) dt.27-01-2015 Supaul to consider and dispose of the Case No.1 of 2014 filed by the petitioners expeditiously preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order on its own merit and in accordance with law but not before granting reasonable opportunity in accordance with law to all the parties concerned including the respondent nos.5 and 6. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) N.H./- U