← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10824/2017disposed

Rajesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-11-28Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10824 of 2017 ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar Singh Son of Late Surendra Prasad Singh, Presently Posted in the office of Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division Khagaria, District- Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Minor Water Resource Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Chief Engineer, Minor Water Resources Department, Bhagalpur.

4. The Superintending Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Munger.

5. The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Khagaria. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bidhanesh Misra For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ajit Kumar- Ga9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 28-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

In the present case, only grievance has been raised by the petitioner that he was directed to handover the charge to the Class-IV employee. Accordingly, he handed over the charge. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the authority should not take the work of Class-III employee from the Class-IV employee.

In the opinion of this Court, as and when the petitioner has handed over the charge, his responsibility is over. The present writ application is not a P.I.L., when he has handed over the charge, his responsibility is over, now this Court finds, the grievance raised has no connection with the condition of service.

Patna High Court CWJC No.10824 of 2017 dt.28-11-2018 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention of this Court towards Paragraph no.1 wherein it has been stated that work of Class-III employee should not be taken from Class-IV employee.

It is for the employer to decide in what manner the administration would run and the Court will not like to interfere unnecessarily in running the administration.

With the aforementioned observation, this writ application is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 03.12.2018 Transmission Date