Patna High CourtMJC/4068/2014disposed

Rajesh Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-04-29Mr. Justice V.N. Sinha1 pages

Patna High Court MJC No.4068 of 2014 dt.29-04-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4068 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11113 of 2012 =========================================================== Rajesh Choudhary Son of Sri Parmanand Choudhary, Resident of Vivekanand Colony, Ward No. 21, P.S. - Katihar, Distt. - Katihar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, Now North Power Distribution Company, Ltd. Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, namely Shri Sandeep Panday

2. Sri B. Shrivastava, the General Manager, Electric Department, Distt. - Katihar, Now North Power-Distribution Company Ltd. Katihar, Distt. - Katihar.

3. Sri Mukesh Prasad, the Deputy General Manager, Electric Department, Distt.- Katihar, North Power Distribution Company Ltd. Katihar, Distt. - Katihar.

4. Sri Ram Sudhin Singh, the Chief Electric Engineer, Katihar, District-Katihar, Now North Power Distribution Company Ltd. Katihar, Distt. - Katihar.

5. Sri Ajay Kumar, the Superintendent Electric Engineer, Katihar, Distt. - Katihar, Now North Power Distribution Company, Ltd. Katihar, Distt. - Katihar.

6. Sri Umesh Bhagat, the Executive Electric Engineer, Katihar, District- Katihar, Now Power North Power Distribution Company Ltd. Katihar, Distt. - Katihar.

7. Sri Ajit Kumar, the Assistant Electric Engineer, Katihar, Distt. - Katihar, Now North Power Distribution Company Ltd. Katihar, Distt. - Katihar.

8. Sri Shahdeo Singh, Junior Electric Engineer, Katihar, Distt. - Katihar, Now North Power Distribution Company Ltd. Katihar, Distt. - Katihar. .... .... Opp.Party/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opp.Party/s : Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 29-04-2015 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that during pendency of the contempt petition order of the writ Court has been complied with and the prayer to initiate proceeding for contempt has become infructuous, which is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/- (V.N. Sinha, J.) U