Jaldhari Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48518 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-424 Year-2017 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== JALDHARI SAHANI Son of Chandeshwar Sahani Resident of Village - Godhia, P.S.- Shikarganj, Dist.- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sangeet Deokuliar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nitya Nand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Chiraiya (Shikarganj) P.S. Case No. 424 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner had earlier moved this Court for regular bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 59249 of 2018 which was dismissed on 20.11.2018 with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completing one year in custody.

It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that he is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48518 of 2019(2) dt.07-08-2019 2/2 innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 24.03.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Sikarahana at Dhaka, East Champaran, in connection with Chiraiya (Shikarganj) P.S. Case No. 424 of 2017 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T