← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7433/2021bail granted

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Chaudhary @ Bhim Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2021-05-25Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7433 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-493 Year-2020 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== SONU KUMAR @ SONU CHAUDHARY @ BHIM CHAUDHARY S/o LALBABU CHAUDHARY Resident of Village- Gadai Sarai, P.S.- Sadar Hajipur, Distt.- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-05-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections-30(a) and 56(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 191.175 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7433 of 2021(2) dt.25-05-2021 2/3 petitioner. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of secret information. The source and genuineness of secret information has not been disclosed by the prosecution. It is alleged that 191.175 liters wine is recovered from the house of co-accused. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also the lockdown, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 493 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7433 of 2021(2) dt.25-05-2021 3/3 two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T