Ram Sevak Yadav @ Ramsevak Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6870 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2001 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ram Sevak Yadav @ Ramsevak Yadav Son Of Late Tunni Yadav Resident Of Village- Chhattapur,Police Station- Andhramath, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mrs.Kumari Shubham, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-06-2021 Heard the parties in virtual Court.
Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. Petitioner is in custody since 16.06.2020. Due to nonappearance of the petitioner, bail bond was cancelled on 11.06.2010. Petitioner undertakes to make no further default. The report of the learned Trial Judge reveals that the trial is at the primary stage of prosecution evidence. Considering the facts of this case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6870 of 2021(3) dt.23-06-2021 2/2 the case is pending in connection with Laukahi (Andharamath)Police Station Case No.141 of 2001, corresponding to G.R.No.100/2005 (giving rise to S.T.No.244 of 2003) with following conditions:
(a) Both the bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.
(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.
(c) The petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.
(d) The petitioner shall not default in future, failing which the learned court below shall be at liberty to conclude the trial keeping the petitioner in custody.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Nitesh/- U T