Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Yadav @ Raushan Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.40167 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -466 Year- 2017 Thana -JAMUI District- JAMUI ======================================================
1. Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Yadav @ Raushan Yadav son of Kanhaiya Yadav.
2. Parwati Devi wife of Kanhaiya Yadav, Both are resident of VillageBhachhiyar, P.S. and District Jamui. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Mukesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-07-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Jamui P.S.Case No.466 of 2017 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of assault by the 'Butt' portion of the revolver and against the petitioner no.2 is of assault by the 'lathi' and the injuries are simple in nature. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is case and counter case and the injuries are simple in nature. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40167 of 2018 (2) dt.11-07-2018 2/2 circumstances, as stated above , let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Jamui in connection with Jamui P.S.Case No.466 of 2017 subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make themselves available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bond. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T