Bhudal @ Bikram Manghi @ Manjhi v. State Of Bihar And ANR

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7963 of 2015 (2) dt.03-03-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7963 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -330 Year- 2013 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Bhudal @ Bikram Manghi @ Manjhi Son of Saudagar Manjhi resident of village- Mangobandar(Khaira), P.S. Khaira, District- Jamui .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Anita Devi@champa Devi wife of Bhudal vill- Mango Bardor ( Khaira tola) , Distt- Jamui .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s Mr. Gulnar Begum(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 03.03.2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.

At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2 submits that opposite party no.2 is still ready to lead her conjugal life with the petitioner.

In view of the aforesaid submission, this anticipatory bail stands disposed of with direction to petitioner to surrender before the Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jamui/ concerned court in connection with Complaint case no. 330C/2013 within four weeks from the date of receipt /production of a copy of this order and seek regular bail and if petitioner does so, the concerned court shall release the petitioner on provisional bail on the day of his surrender for a period of four months on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to his satisfaction.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7963 of 2015 (2) dt.03-03-2015 Furthermore, after being released the petitioner on provisional bail, the concerned court shall issue notice to the petitioner as well as complainant fixing a date for reconciliation and shall take all possible steps to patch up the dispute of the parties and in the above stated attempt, if the concerned court succeeds to patch up the dispute of the parties, the concerned court shall pass order for confirmation of bail of the petitioner but if the concerned court fails due to rigid approach of the petitioner, then, in that event, provisional bail of the petitioner will not be confirmed by the court below and in that event, petitioner shall be taken into custody and his regular bail application shall be decided by the concerned court on its own merit. It goes without saying that if the aforesaid effort fails on account of rigid and non-cooperative approach of the complainant, the provisional bail of the petitioner shall be confirmed by the court below itself.

Shahid ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.) U T