← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/778/2016dismissed

R. K. Rajan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-05-04Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.778 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6610 of 2013 ====================================================== R. K. Rajan, son of Sri Moorat Lal, Resident of Bihar Road, Hilsa, Nalanda at present residing at Hari Niketan (formerly Pushp Prakash Bhawan), near Choudhary Petrol Pump, Kankarbagh Main Road, P.S.- Kankarbagh, Patna- .... .... Petitioner / Appellant

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Home Secretary, Department of Home, Bihar, Patna

3. The District Magistrate, Nalanda

4. The S.D.O., Hilsa, Nalanda

5. The Superintendent of Police, Nalanda

6. The Officer-in-Charge, Hilsa P.S., Nalanda

7. Smt. Nilu Kumari, Wife of Shailesh Kumar Sao, Resident of MohallaKoeri Tola, Hilsa, District- Nalanda .... .... Respondents / Respondents.

====================================================== Appearance:

For the Appellant/s : Mr. R. K. Rajan. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Alok Ranjan, AC to GA 6. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 04-05-2017 On 04.04.2017 the appellant was granted four weeks with a condition that the matter should be argued today else the matter shall be heard and decided.

In the order dated 24.02.2016 passed by the learned Writ Court in CWJC No. 6610/2013 we find that in the matter of private dispute of property between the appellant and the private respondent the Writ Court refused to interfere on account of various factors primarily that it is a private dispute of property

Patna High Court LPA No.778 of 2016 (6) dt.04-05-2017 2/2 which cannot be gone into in a writ application. We dispose of the matter granting liberty to the parties to take recourse to the remedy available under law.

The learned Writ Court has not committed any error warranting interference. The appeal is therefore dismissed. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) Dilip, AR U