Baijnath Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.600 of 2021 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7996 of 2020 ====================================================== Baijnath Kumar Son of Radhey Shyam Sharma resident of Village and PostAmahara, Police Station- Bihta, District- Patna. ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Engineer in Chief, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Executive Engineer, Sone Canal Division, Khagaul, Patna. 5.
The Sub Divisional Officer, Sone Canal Division, Bikram, District- Patna. 6.
The Junior Engineer, Sone Canal Division, Bikram, District- Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr. Kamal Nayan Chaubey, Advocate Mr.Ambuj Nayan Chaubey, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Anjani Kumar, AAG-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice/Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.) 24-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This appeal is directed against the order dated 22.07.2021 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 7996 of 2020, titled as Baijnath Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors., by a learned
Patna High Court L.P.A No.600 of 2021(2) dt.24-01-2022 2/2 Single Bench of this Court.
After the matter was heard for some time, finding the Bench not to be agreeable with the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant, Shri Kamal Nayan Chaubey, learned Sr. Advocate appearing for the appellant, under instructions, states that appellant may be permitted to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to seek review of the order impugned herein.
Liberty, as prayed for, is granted.
As and when such application for review is filed, the Registry shall process the same expeditiously. Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
Interlocutory application, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) K.C.Jha/DKS U