Arun Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7806 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2020 Thana- MOHAMMADPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

ARUN RAM S/O Sri Krishna Ram Resident of Village - Majhwaliya, P.S. - Mohammadpur, Dist. - Gopalganj.

2.

BHAGYANARAYAN RAM S/O Ramashray Ram Resident of Village - Majhwaliya, P.S. - Mohammadpur, Dist. - Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, Advocate :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-04-2021 Heard Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State through video conferencing.

Petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Mohammadpur P.S.Case No.150 of 2020 registered for an offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 326, 302, 447 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation as per the First Information Report is that the petitioners along with other accused altogether 29 in numbers arrived at the house of the informant, assaulted his brother and other family members due to which the brother of the informant, namely, Santosh Ram died and other family

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7806 of 2021(2) dt.16-04-2021 2/3 members received injuries.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have not committed any offence in the manner alleged and there is a dispute between the parties with regard to grazing of goat in the field of the uncle of the informant, namely, Ramnath Ram. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that there is specific allegation against Krishna Ram who allegedly assaulted the brother of the informant Santosh Ram by means of farsa due to which he died on the spot and no overt-act has been alleged against the petitioners who have been made accused along with entire family members, i.e., 29 in numbers. Learned counsel next submits that there is case and counter case between the parties inasmuch as the coaccused Krishna Ram has lodged Mohammadpur P.S. Case No.

151 of 2020 against the informant and others for an incident which has taken place on the same date and time. Learned counsel next submits that the petitioners are in custody since 17.07.2020 and charge-sheet has already been submitted. Having regard to the submissions made by the parties and taking into consideration the material on record and the fact that no overt-act has been alleged against the petitioners, petitioners are in custody since 17.07.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7806 of 2021(2) dt.16-04-2021 3/3 already been submitted, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, let the above named two petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Gopalganj in connection with Mohammadpur P.S. Case No.150 of 2020. It is made clear that at the time of furnishing bail bond all the parties shall follow the guidelines regarding social distancing.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) Brajesh Kr./- U T