Patna High CourtCWJC/18659/2011disposed

Ganga Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-26Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.18659 of 2011 dt.26-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18659 of 2011 =========================================================== Ganga Prasad S/O Sri Dipty Ram R/O Village + Post- Parasiya, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur (Arrah) .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Ara

3. The District Collector, Bhojpur, Ara

4. The District Supply Officer, Bhojpur, Ara

5. The Sub-Divisional Officer Jagdishpur, Bhojpur (Ara)

6. The Block Development Officer, Jagdishpur, Bhojpur (Ara)

7. The Block Supply Officer, Jagdishpur, Bhojpur (Ara)

8. The Panchayat Sevak Cum Panchayat Secretary Gram Panchayat Parasiya, Block- Jagishpur, District- Bhojpur (Ara) .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Maya Shankar Mishra, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Dhurjati Kr Prasad, GP-14 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 26-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 01.08.2011 passed by Prakhand Office issued under the signature of Block Development Officer, Jagdishpur (BHojpur) by which the petitioner was directed to deposit the total amount of Rs. 78,090/- one time till 12.08.2011 otherwise legal action will be taken against him.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the

Patna High Court CWJC No.18659 of 2011 dt.26-10-2018 Enquiry Commission headed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Udai Sinha (Retired) has now submitted its report and any further action in relation to recovery of the value of undistributed rice under the SGRY Scheme would abide by the decision of the State Government to be taken on the basis of such report.

4. In the above view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach this Court afresh as and when the occasion arises in future.

5. Having regard to the stand of the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

6. Let the authorities refrain from taking coercive measures against the petitioner until decision is taken by the State Government, as aforesaid.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 30.10.2018 Transmission Date N.A.