Krishna Murari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7753 of 2016 =========================================================== Krishna Murari, Son of Shri Bhola Singh, Resident of Village - Maro, P.O.-Maro, P.S.-Suryagarha, District-Lakhisarai.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Secretariat Building, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Power and Energy Department, Secretariat Building, Patna.
3. The Bihar State Power Transmission Company Ltd. (B.S.P.T.C.L.) Bailey Road, Patna.
4. The Chief Managing Director, Bihar Electricity Board (B.S.E.B.), Jawaharlal Nehru Patna, Bailey Road, Patna.
5. The Managing Director, Transmission, Bihar Electricity Board (B.S.E.B.), Jawaharlal Nehru Patna, Bailey Road, Patna.
6. The Chief Engineer, Transmission, Bihar Electricity Board (B.S.E.B.), Jawaharlal Nehru Patna, Bailey Road, Patna.
7. The Chief Engineer, Generation, the Bihar State Power Transmission Company Ltd. (B.S.P.T.C.L.), Bailey Road, Patna.
Respondent 1st Party
8. Associated Power Structure Pvt. Ltd. (A.P.S.), Barodra, Gujarat.
9. Parag Kothari, Managing Director, Associated Power Structure Pvt. Ltd. (A.P.S.), 905/3, G.I.D.C. Makarpura, Barodra, Gujarat, PIN-390010.
10. G. K. Chaudhary, Chief Engineer, Associated Power Structure, Pvt. Ltd. Baroda, Gujarat.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance:
For the Petitioner/s :
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ravindra Kumar, AC to AAG-6. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 10-02-2017 The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court alleging therein that Transmission Line from Barauni Thermal Power Station to G.S.S. Hajipur is not being completed according to the Contract and that an enquiry should be conducted.
Patna High Court CWJC No.7753 of 2016 dt.10-02-2017 2/2 We find that whether the contractual terms have been followed or not is to be examined by the agency who has granted contract.
We do not find that any fishing enquiry can be permitted at the instance of a busy body in a public interest litigation. Accordingly, the writ application stands dismissed. (Hemant Gupta, ACJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) Mishra AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.
CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 14.02.2017 Transmission Date