Rinki Kumar @ Ricky Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50370 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2026 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Rinki Kumar @ Ricky Kumar Son of Ranjit Kumar Resident of Village -Rampur Bakhra @ Rampur Bakhara Ward No 10, PS- Bhagwanpur, District -Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manish Chandra Gandhi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar, A.P.P ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 25 of 2026 in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 118(1), 109, 74, 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 303(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per prosecution, on 12.01.2026, informant was constructing his house, in the meantime, petitioner along with other co-accused persons came, stopped the construction work and started assaulting the petitioner with sharp edged weapon, sword, iron rod and lathi. It is further alleged that, as a consequence of the said assault, the head of the informant was ruptured.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50370 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The Counsel further submits that petitioner and the informant are agnates and due to land dispute, this case was lodged by the informant. Lastly, the counsel submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Having heard the parties and taking into account that there is specific allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is, hereby, rejected.

8. However, if petitioner surrenders before the concerned Trial Court within a period of six weeks from today then in that case, the Trial Court is directed to pass an order on his surrender-cum-bail application, without being prejudice that the anticipatory bail of the petitioner has been rejected by this Court and the Trial Court shall pass order on the merit of this case.

(Alok Kumar, J) Bipin/- U T