Lalmuni Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.1247 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21805 of 2014 ====================================================== Lalmuni Devi, Wife of Late Dhankuber Tiwary, Resident of village- Bansdila, P.O.- Kopa Bazar, Police Station- Kopa, District-Saran (Chapra). ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through, the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
2. Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University, Kameshwar Nagar Darbhanga through its Registrar.
3. The Vice-Chancellor, Kamesahwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University, Kameshwar Nagar Darbhanga.
4. The Registrar, Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University, Kameshwar Nagar Darbhanga.
5. The Principal, Bharat Mishra Sanskrit College, Chapra, District-Saran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr. Bashishtha Narayan Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey - AAG-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 06-10-2018
1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 10.08.2017 in C.W.J.C. No. 21805 of 2014, by which the learned Single Judge has dismissed the said writ petition in which the original writ-petitioner-widow of the deceased employee prayed for the family pension, the original writpetitioner has preferred the present Letters Patent Appeal.
2. Considering the fact that it was found that the
Patna High Court LPA No.1247 of 2017 dt.06-10-2018 2/2 deceased employee had not completed the minimum qualifying service of 10 years which was required for the purpose of family pension and thereby the widow was denied the family pension and considering the above when the learned Single Judge has dismissed the petition, it cannot be said that the learned Single Judge has committed any error which calls for the interference of this Court in exercise of the intra court appellate jurisdiction.
3. In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, the present Letters Patent Appeal fails and the same deserves to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed. (Mukesh R. Shah, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) P.K.P./-R.S.Sen AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 08.10.2018 Transmission Date