Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.43156 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2018 Thana- MAKER District- Saran ====================================================== Manish Kumar, S/o Ravindra Singh, R/o Village- Paschim Thahara, P.S.- Maker, District- Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anant Kumar Bhaskar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Murlidhar, APP 110 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 27-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 30.04.2018 in connection with Maker P.S. Case No. 53 of 2018 registered under Sections 413, 414, 420 of Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the vehicle recovered from the possession of the petitioner was not declared to be a stolen vehicle and only because the papers of the said vehicle were not available with the petitioner, the checking team has taken him into custody. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Maker P.S. Case No.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43156 of 2018(2) dt.27-07-2018 2/2 53 of 2018 to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate XII, Saran at Chapra on the following conditions.
(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably father, mother, brother, sister of petitioner.
(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Shamshad/uma/- U