Sushil Kumar Rai And ORS v. The Bihar Staff Selection Commission And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7161 of 2016 ===========================================================

1. Sushil Kumar Rai, Son of Ram Nandan Rai, R/O- Village- Musapur, P.S. Ghantha, District- Samastipur.

2. Anil Kumar Jha, S/o - Late Brahmdeo Jha, resident of Village- Singhiya Bujurg South , P.S.- Bibhutipur, District- Samastipur.

3. Ashok Kumar Gupta Son of Late Ram Swarath Gupta, R/o Village- Ujiarpur, District-Samastipur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Bihar Staff Selection Commission through its Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Secretary Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Bihar, Patna.

3. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Commissioner Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga.

5. The District Magistrate, Samastipur.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr S.P.Shrivastava Mr. Amitabh Bhardwaj For the State : Mr. M.N.Hoda Khan, SC 1 Mrs Babita Kumari, AC to SC 1 For the Staff Selection : Mr K.K.Upadhyay Mr C.B.Das =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 16-12-2016 After having perused the original file relating to the advertisement issued by the Staff Selection Commission, the Court is satisfied that adequate information and wide publicity has been given to one and all inviting applications to fill up the post of Driver across the State of Bihar.

If the petitioners have not applied pursuant to the same, this Court cannot bail them out at this juncture since the process is in

Patna High Court CWJC No.7161 of 2016 dt.16-12-2016 2/2 the final stage. If the petitioners want to challenge the contents of the advertisement, they are free to do so. However, the permission does not mean that the petitioners may have case for the same. The correctness and otherwise of such challenge will be considered on its own merit.

Writ is dismissed with liberty as above.

Personal presence of the Secretary is dispensed with. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 16.12.2016 Transmission Date NA