Rajesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6945 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2020 Thana- GAYA KOTWALI District- Gaya ====================================================== RAJESH YADAV SON OF LATE VISHNU YADAV R/O MOHALLA- GOL BAGICHA (GABRA PAR), P.S.- KOTWALI, DISTRICT- GAYA. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Priya Ranjan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Sufiyan, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.) 16-04-2021 The defect(s) as pointed out by the Office be removed by the learned counsel for the petitioner within two months after the High Court resumes its normal functioning. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is recovery of 10 litres country-made foreign liquor from three storied building of the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner has no concern with the seized liquor. The alleged recovery has been made from newly constructed house

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6945 of 2021(2) dt.16-04-2021 2/2 of the petitioner. Petitioner is in judicial custody since 24.08.2020.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending, in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 156 of 2020, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail, the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) shahzad/- U T