Gautam Nandan Pappu @ Gautam Pappu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51244 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-228 Year-2022 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Gautam Nandan Pappu @ Gautam Pappu S/o Harinandan Rai R/o villageRohua Balgovindpur, P.S.- Jandaha, District- Vaishali at Hajipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Binod Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 11-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

Allegedly, it is a case of recovery of illicit liquor from the two vehicles.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that he has no concern with the seized liquor and the vehicles and no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51244 of 2022(2) dt.11-11-2022 2/2 has not been apprehended at the spot. He further submits that on the basis of secret information, the name of the petitioner was disclosed.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner, above named in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Prohibition & Excise Court No.II-cum-Additional District & Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 228 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T