Sunil Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21505 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1915 Year- 2015 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District- PATNA =====================================

1. Sunil Kumar S/o Sita Sharan Sinha, Resident of MohallaUpadhyay Lane, West Lohanipur, P.O. and P.S.- Kadam Kuan, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Manglesh Pandey S/o Sri Janardan Pandey, Resident of village- Brap, P.O.- Beghea, P.S.- Garhani, District- Bhojpur (Ara). Presently residing at New Mobarakpur, Chandmari Road, Danapur, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna .... .... Opposite Party/s ===================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Ajit Kumar (App) ===================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-12-2016 Heard the parties.

The present application, under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has been filed seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to opposite party No. 2, who is an accused in Complaint Case No. 1915(c) of 2015, registered for the offence punishable under Section

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21505 of 2016 (2) dt.05-12-2016 2/2 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. Opposite Party No.

has been granted anticipatory bail by an order, dated 23.02.2016, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Patna, in ABP No. 1410 of 2016.

Upon perusal of the present application for cancellation of anticipatory bail, I find that there is nothing substantial to indicate that opposite party No. 2 ever misused the privilege of bail by either making any attempt to tamper with the evidence or influence the witnesses. Considering the above, I do not find any merit in this application. This application is, accordingly, rejected. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Praveen-II/- U T