← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19261/2016dismissed

Vinay Kumar Pappu And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar

2016-09-16Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19261 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -375 Year- 2012 Thana -GANDHIMAIDAN District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Vinay Kumar Pappu Son of Late Dr. S.N. Roy Yadav, Resident of Village- S.I. Villa, Goriatoli, Station Road Patna, P.S.- Kotwali, Distirct- Patna.

2. Hemlata Verma wife of Arbind Kumar Verma, C/o Arbind printing press, Rajabazar, P.S. Shastrinagar District- Patna.

3. Reeta Roy, wife of Late Shyam Sundar Roy, Resident of MohallaNayatola, P.S. Kadamkuan, District- Patna.

4. Sanjay Kumar Singh, son of Mohan Prasad Singh Resident of MohalllaDigha Ghat, Patipul, P.S.- Digha, District- Patna.

5. Dharmendra Prasad Munna, Son of Late Dhirendra Bhadur Prasad, Resident of Mohalla- Harnaha Tola Ranipur, Lodikatra, Patna City, P.SKajenkalan District- Patna. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, adv. Mr. Ram Naresh Prasad, adv.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. G.S. Gupta (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

This application has been filed for quashing the order of cognizance dated 01.04.2014 passed in Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 375 of 2012 (G.R. No.5655 of 2012) by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna, for the offence under

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19261 of 2016 (2) dt.16-09-2016 2/2 Sections 504, 506, 509/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3 (i) (v) (xi) of the S.C./ S.T. Act. This court does not find any error in the order of cognizance passed by the court below. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. However, liberty is given to the petitioners to raise all the points at the time of framing of the charge.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U T