Sujeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61122 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2021 Thana- JAMOBAZAR District- Siwan ====================================================== SUJEET KUMAR S/o MURLIDHAR PRASAD R/o VILLAGERAGHUNATHPUR, P.S-JAMO BAZAR, DISTRICT-SIWAN. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumari Anupam, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 06-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 504, 506 of the IPC.

Allegedly, all the FIR named accused persons including the petitioners armed with deadly weapons, indiscriminately assaulted the informant with a common intention to kill him. When the informant's cousin and brother tried to save him, the accused persons assaulted them also. In the said occurrence, the informant has sustained several injuries.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to local village

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61122 of 2021(2) dt.06-07-2022 2/2 politics. Both parties are agnates and there is an admitted land dispute between them. For the alleged occurrence there is also a case and counter-case between the parties. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner to have assaulted the informant by means of iron rod and the injuries are grievous in nature. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the gravity of the allegation and that the injuries are grievous in nature, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner named above is hereby rejected.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T