← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51790/2025dismissed

Ranjeet Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-22Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51790 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-479 Year-2024 Thana- MAJHAULIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Ranjeet Sahni, S/o JangBahadur Shahani, Resident of Village- Madhopur, Ward No. 5, PS- Majhauliya, Distt.- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with Majhauliya P.S. Case No. 479 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 140(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. which was earlier rejected by this Court vide order dated 05.02.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 83713 of 2024 and the dead body of the deceased was found leading to disclosure in confessional statement of this petitioner.

3. Earlier vide order dated 25.07.2025, a report regarding the stage of trial was called for from the learned trial Court. From perusal of the report of the learned trial Court, it transpires that two witnesses have been examined in this case on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51790 of 2025(3) dt.22-08-2025 2/2 fact and only three witnesses are remaining for examination.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was living separate from the deceased.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.

7. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after examination of the informant.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T