← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21376/2016bail granted

Banbari Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2016-05-19Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21376 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -120 Year- 2016 Thana -DARBHANGA SADAR DistrictDARBHANGA ====================================================== Banbari Yadav son of Late Ruplal Yadav, resident of village- Sara Mohanpur, P.S. Sadar, District- Darbhanga.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjit Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Darbhanga Sadar P.S. Case No.120 of 2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 474, 484, 170 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. As per FIR, the police raided the house of the petitioner, from where nine Bangladeshi citizens were arrested. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the landlord of the house and on the identification of one Santosh Yadav he has given his house on rent to nine Bangladeshi persons.

It appears that the petitioner is the landlord of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21376 of 2016 (2) dt.19-05-2016 2/2 house and there is no material on record which connects the petitioner with those Bangladeshi persons.

Having considered the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner-Banbari Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10, 000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, in connection with Darbhanga Sadar P.S. Case No.120 of 2016, subject to the conditions that:- (i) one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner;

(ii) if the petitioner is found involved in similar type of case in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the Court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and;

(iii) that the petitioner would participate in the court proceeding and in the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U