Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51809/2014rejected

Amrendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2015-05-21Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51809 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -208 Year- 2014 Thana -BIRAUL District- DARBHANGA ====================================================== Amrendra Yadav, Son of Ramhit Yadav, resident of village - Sihaul, P.S. Biraul, District - Darbhanga .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gajendra Prasad Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 21-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, being the husband of the deceased, is apprehending his arrest in connection with Biraul P.S. Case No.208 of 2014 for allegedly having committed the offences under Sections 328 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after the present case was lodged implicating the petitioner by his mother-in-law stating that her daughter had been killed after giving poison, the informant has come forward to state that it was a mistake on her part to lodge the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn my attention to Annexure 3 series, which are affidavits filed by the father and mother of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51809 of 2014 (3) dt.21-05-2015 2/2 deceased stating that by mistake their daughter had taken Sulphas instead of taking any painkiller. However, after perusal of the case diary, learned counsel for the State has pointed out that the girl in question had committed suicide as she was being tortured for not giving birth to any child after marriage. Considering the facts and circumstances in its entirety, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The criminal miscellaneous application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T