Md. Kalim v. The State Of Bihar, Through Principal Secretary,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18218 of 2021 ====================================================== 1.

Md. Kalim Son of Late Basir, Resident of Village - Dadua, P.O. Sukki, Police Sttion- Patepur, District- Vaishali at Hajipur. 2.

Md. Ijhar Ahmad Son of Md. Halim 3.

Md. Imtiyaj Son of Md. Halim Both Sl.No.2 and 3 are Resident of Village - Dadua, P.O. - Sukki, Police Station- Patepur, District- Vaishali at Hajipur. 4.

Md. Irshad, Son of Late Md. Idrish, Resident of Village - Dadua, P.O. - Sukki, P.S.- Patepur, District- Vaishali at Hajipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Director of Consolidation, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Deputy Director Consolidation (Muzaffarpur), Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Assistant Director of Consolidation, Vaishali. 5.

The Consolidation Officer, Patepur, Vaishali. 6.

Abdul Sattar Son of Late Manauwar Ali 7.

Abdul Gaffar Son of Late Manauwar Ali Both are Resident of Village - Dadua, P.O. - Sukki, P.S. - Patepur, DistrictVaishali 8.

Most. Ajmoon Khatton, Wife of Md. Ajmoin, D/o Late Abdul Hamid 9.

Most. Najmoon Khatoon Wife of Md. Isharaphil, D/o Late Abdul Hamid Both are Resident of Village - Manihari, P.S. Bochha, District - Muzaffarpur. 10.

Hajmoon Khatoon Wife of Md. Mir Hassan Resident of Village - Bochha, P.S. Bochha, District - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar Ambastha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

AC to SC-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 29-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned AC to SC-25.

2. The defects as pointed out by the office is ignored.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing

Patna High Court CWJC No.18218 of 2021(2) dt.29-10-2024 2/2 vehemently for sometime realizing his difficulty seeks permission to withdraw the writ application with liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law before an appropriate forum in accordance with law.

4. Permission is accorded.

5. Accordingly, the writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U