Dilshad Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54351 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2024 Thana- MAINATAND District- West Champaran ====================================================== Dilshad Alam Son of Nuriyad Ansari Village- Bahera, Ps- Sikta, Dist- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mainatand P.S. Case No. 78 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that this petitioner was apprehended with stolen car.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case merely on the basis of suspicion. No incriminating/looted article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the vehicle in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54351 of 2024(2) dt.07-08-2024 2/2 question. Learned counsel further submitted that there is no material on record to show that the petitioner is involved in the theft of the vehicle in question. Learned counsel furthers submitted that there is no iota of truth in the facts and circumstances of the case. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 09.05.2024 and has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Mainatand P.S. Case No. 78 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T