Patna High CourtCWJC/7588/2016dismissed

Sudhir Kumar Verma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-10-03Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7588 of 2016 =========================================================== Sudhir Kumar Verma son of Late Harihar Prasad Verma, resident of Vill.- Rajapakar, P.S.- Rajapakar, Dist.- Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Registration, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Registration, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Inspector General of Registration, Registration, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The Assistant Inspector General of Registration, Registration, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

5. The District Magistrate-cum-District Registrar, Vaishali at Hajipur

6. The District Sub Registrar, Registry Office, Hajipur, Dist- Vaishali .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent/s :

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 03-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State.

2. In view of the judgment passed by this Court today in C.W.J.C. No. 6708 of 2016 (Bihar Dastavej Navis Sangh and Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar and Ors.), and the issue involved being identical, the present writ petition also stands dismissed in terms of reasons recorded therein.

3. However, learned counsel for the petitioner drew the attention of the Court to Annexure-9, which is copy of show cause dated 02.04.2016 to the petitioner. According to him, he has also

Patna High Court CWJC No.7588 of 2016 dt.03-10-2017 2 / 2 replied to the same, copy of which is Annexure-10 to the writ application.

4. Be that as it may, as the Court is not in a position to come to a definite conclusion as neither any date is mentioned on the so called reply submitted by the petitioner nor there is any receipt by any authority, if the respondent no. 6 is in receipt of such show cause filed by the petitioner, the same shall be considered, in accordance with law, and order passed thereupon.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Anjani/- AFR/NAFR U