← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/11283/2024dismissed

Prafull Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-01Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy,The Chief Justice-2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11283 of 2024 ====================================================== Prafull Ranjan S/o Sri. Ramesh Chandra Singh, Resident of Village and P.O - Kala Dumra, P.S- Gautam Buddha Nagar, Sub division- Maharajganj, District- Siwan (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Water Resource Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Engineer in Chief, Water Resource Department, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Divisional Commissioner, Saran (Chapra).

5.

The District Magistrate, Gopalganj.

6.

The Superintending Engineer, Flood Control, Water Resource Department, Gopalganj.

7.

The Chief Engineer, Flood Control and Water Discharge, Water Resource Department, Gopalganj.

8.

The Executive Engineer, Flood Control, Water Resource Department, Gopalganj.

9.

The District Magistrate, Siwan.

10.

The Executive Engineer, Flood Control and Water Discharge, Water Resource Department, Siwan.

11.

Ms. Mateshwari Construction, Makma Niwas, New Area Chirand Nagar, District- Aurangabad.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Advocate General ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 01-08-2024 The petitioner is concerned with the collapse of bridges which has occurred at many locations in the State of Bihar.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court has already taken

Patna High Court CWJC No.11283 of 2024(2) dt.01-08-2024 2/2 cognizance of the same and directed the State of Bihar to respond. This was widely publicised in the newspapers and the present attempt of the petitioner is more in the nature of a publicity induced litigation. We find no reason to entertain the same.

The writ petition stands dismissed.

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) Harsh/- U