Binod Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51407 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-638 Year-2019 Thana- KANTI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Binod Singh Son Of Late Ganga Singh Resident Of Village- Mani Phulkahan, P.S.- Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Hari Kishore Thakur For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Asha Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 09-12-2022 The matter has been taken-up through video conferencing.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
Let the defect (s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation is of against unknown persons of kidnapping of the daughter of the informant, when she went to Harichanda Chowk for purchasing falls of Saree.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It is submitted that Tutu Kumar was residing in the petitioner's house since 6-7 months on rent and the petitioner is the co-villager of the informant and the house of the petitioner is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51407 of 2022(2) dt.09-12-2022 2/2 situated at a short distance from the informant's house and the informant and her daughter were on talking term with the accused Tutu Kumar. It is stated that the next day of the occurrence, the victim girl was recovered and her statement was recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the Magistrate. The victim had not made any allegation in her statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. Further, it is submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 05.06.2022, he has no criminal antecedent and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.
Learned A.P.P for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) only with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 638 of 2019.
(Khatim Reza, J) Sankalp/- U T