Teju Singh @ Jai Govind Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51878 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-245 Year-2019 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas ====================================================== Teju Singh @ Jai Govind Singh S/o Babuchand Singh Resident of VillageDhaudand, P.S.- Sasaram (M), District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajani Kant Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nityanand, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 14-10-2022 Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within two weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual mode.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sasaram (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 245 of 2019, lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

As per prosecution case, the total recovery of 3110.400 liters of foreign liquor were made in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from the seizure list, it transpires that the said recovery was made near Talhati of Mountain. He further submits that the antecedent of petitioner is clean but as soon as he got information about

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51878 of 2022(2) dt.14-10-2022 2/3 figuring his name in this case, he has surrendered before the Court on 07.03.2022. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner approached for anticipatory bail but it was rejected then only he is persuading for regular bail. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, let the petitioner above named, be granted bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.2 cum Additional District and Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 245 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. with other following conditions: A. The petitioner shall support in trial and shall appear physically before the lower court on each and every date fixed, in case of non-appearance for two consecutive dates without sufficient cause, shall be resulted into cancellation of his bail bond.

B. One of the bailors shall be close relative who shall file affidavit before the court about his relationship with the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51878 of 2022(2) dt.14-10-2022 3/3 petitioner.

With this observation, the bail application stands allowed.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) ritik/- U T