Uday Kant Jha And ORS. v. Srimati Binda Devi And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Review No.330 of 2014 With Interlocutory Application No. 3785 of 2016 In First Appeal No. 196 of 1979 ======================================================
1. Uday Kant Jha
2. Krishna Kumar Jha
3. Lalan Jha @ Anil Kumar Jha
4. Chandra Kumar Jha
5. Amiri Jha
6. Nonoo Jha All sons of Uday Kant Jha, resident of Village Gajhara, P.S.Ladania Prg. Jabdi, P.O. Gajhara,District Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. Bijay Kant Jha
2. Jay Kant Jha
3. Indra Kant Jha All sons of Badri Narain Jha, resident of Villate Bithuar, P.S. and District Madhubani
4. Smt. Chirajivi Devi wife of Sri Nunu Jha of village Dehat, P.S.Rajnagar, District Madhubani
5. Srimati Madan Devi alias Smt.Mahadevi, daughter of Chhakuri Jha wife of Shri Dhaneshwar Jha, resident of village Sighiouri, P.S.Rajnagar, District Madhubani
6. Hira Jha
7. Tuna Jha
8. Buchhi Jha All sons of Maya Kanat Jha, resident of village Gonauli, P.S.Adndhra Tharhi, District Madhubani
9. Bishnu Khant Jha son of Late Ram Jha
10. Jagdish Jha
11. Hari Jha Both sons of Bishnu Kant Jha
12. Madhu Jha
13. Narainjee Jha
14. Surju Jha All sons of Bishnu Kant Jha
15. Kumar Jha
16. Lalit Jha alias Latifa Jha Both sons of Jagdish Jha, resident of village Gajhara, P.S.Ladaniya, Pargana Jabdi, District Madhubani .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subhash Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opp.Parties/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court C. REV. No.330 of 2014 (4) dt.20-07-2016 2/2 20-07-2016 After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and on going through the order under review, this Court does not find any good ground to review the order dated 02.05.2014 passed in First Appeal No. 196 of 1979 whereby the aforesaid appeal as a whole as also the cross-objection/crossappeal filed on behalf of the respondents have been dismissed. The review application is devoid of merit and is, accordingly, dismissed. I.A.No. 3785 of 2016 stands accordingly disposed of. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Tahir/- U