Mahesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51880 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-325 Year-2024 Thana- RAHUI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Mahesh Singh Son of Late Rambriksh Singh R/O Village- Amba, P.S.- Rahui, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Anil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms.Meena Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-11-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Rahui P.S. Case No. 325 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 447, 448, 341, 342, 323, 325, 337, 338, 354(B), 379, 307, 427 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is of causing assault by means of iron rod leading to fracture injury to the father-in-law of the informant. There is fuhrer allegation against the other accused persons of causing assault and outraging the modesty of the other female members of the informant.
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that on the fateful day on account of some dispute both the parties
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51880 of 2025(3) dt.04-11-2025 2/3 entered into a free fight resulting into injuries to the persons of both sides; however the prosecution has failed to explain the injuries sustained to the persons of the informant. Moreover, the present case is counter version of Rahui P.S. Case No. 324 of 2024, which is earlier on point of time instituted by co-accused Sarun Singh against the husband of the present informant and others. Referring to the injury report of injured Raj Kumar, it is submitted that he has received 3 injuries; out of 3 injuries, injury nos. 2 and 3 are found to be grievous in nature but the same is on non vital part. The name of the petitioner has been implicated only on account of he being karta of the family. The petitioner undertakes that he will fully cooperate in the proceeding of the court.
5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the factum of case and counter case, coupled with the injuries over non vital part of the body and the genesis of the occurrence, let the petitioner abovenamed be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51880 of 2025(3) dt.04-11-2025 3/3 furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Rahui P.S. Case No. 325 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.
(Harish Kumar, J) Anjani/- U T