Sushil Kumar Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar Through Superintendent Of Police, Sitamarhi And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.447 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Sushil Kumar Choudhary Son of Late Kishori Choudhary Resident of Rajbagh, Ward No. 9, P.S.- Pupri, District- Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar Through Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi

2. The Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi

3. The Officer - In- Charge, Pupri Police Station, Sitamarhi

4. Kartik Verma Son of Kailash Verma

5. Kailash Verma Son of not known

6. Narayan Thakur Son of not known

7. Satrughan Thakur Son of not known

8. Jatadhar Lal Karn Son of not known

9. Mithilesh Lal Karn Son of not known

10. Ritesh Lal Karn Son of Jatadhar Lal Karn

11. Bachnu Mandal Son of not known

12. Heera Sah Son of Late Chalitar Sah

13. Vijay Sah Son of Heera Sah

14. Ashish Sah Son of Yogendra Sah

15. Yadvendra Lal Karn @ Phagulal Son of not known

16. Chunnu Lal Karn Son of not known

17. Awanish Kumar Karn Son of Mithilesh Karn

18. Lalu Kumar Son of Vivek Pathak All resident of village- Jhajhihat, P.S.- Pupri, District- Sitamarhi

19. Prem Kumar Son of Vishnu Kant Lal resident of Bhagirathpur, P.S. Pupri, District- Sitamarhi

20. Vishesh Lal Son of Umesh Chandra Lal resident of village- Yadupati, P.S.- Sursand, District- Sitamarhi, presently residing at Jhajhihat, P.S.- Pupri, District- Sitamarhi .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amish Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. G.P.-17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 16-09-2016 Heard Mr. Amish Kumar, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and learned Government Pleader No.17, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. After some argument, learned Counsel for the

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.447 of 2016 (3) dt.16-09-2016 2/2 petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach the Court of competent jurisdiction, where charge-sheet has been filed, with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the Court of competent jurisdiction, where charge-sheet has been filed, with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

(I.A. Ansari, CJ) K.C.jha/- U T